Following the site visit, the External Evaluators should consult with each other to discuss and formulate their final report and recommendations. There will be time during the site visit to meet and begin formulating the final report and to discuss initial findings with the Dean or Director, the Associate Provost for Academic Programs and the Provost
The team should submit to the Provost, Associate Provost for Academic Programs, and Dean or Staff Director a draft program review for commentary, fact checking and clarification. The draft report is usually due 14 to 21 days after the site visit. The final report, incorporating facts and feedback, is usually due 30-60 days after the site visit
The External Evaluators should select a site team coordinator whose responsibility will be to compile the member's contributions into the report. The coordinator will be responsible for submitting the final report by the deadline
Both the draft report and the final report should be submitted to the Associate Provost for Academic Programs electronically as a Word document so it can be formatted into the program review document
The External Evaluators should address the following issues in their final report:
Program/Unit Strengths
Program/Unit Concerns and Persistent Challenges
Recommendations for Improvement
Please describe recommendations for program improvement. If possible, please prioritize your recommendations and include a brief rationalization for your recommendations